<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymous Law Student</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anonymouslawstudent.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anonymouslawstudent.com</link>
	<description>musings from a new legal apparatus.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:32:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the Difference? Attorney or Lawyer?</title>
		<link>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/08/bankruptcy-attorney-or-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/08/bankruptcy-attorney-or-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anonymouslawstudent.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you go around searching for legal assistance do your search for &#8216;lawyer&#8217; or &#8216;attorney&#8217;? I tested this to see if there was a preference. I would think that people would search &#8216;lawyer&#8217; more often than attorney. I don&#8217;t know why I would assume that, seems to be easier to say, we see it more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you go around searching for legal assistance do your search for &#8216;lawyer&#8217; or &#8216;attorney&#8217;? I tested this to see if there was a preference. I would think that people would search &#8216;lawyer&#8217; more often than attorney. I don&#8217;t know why I would assume that, seems to be easier to say, we see it more in the media, and so on&#8230;..  I checked it out in a quick test on Google Trends and found that, simply in terms of trending words, &#8216;attorney&#8217; is searched far more than &#8216;lawyer&#8217;. <span id="more-45"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=bankruptcy+attorney%2C+bankruptcy+lawyer&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=us&#038;geor=all&#038;date=all&#038;sort=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/trends?q=bankruptcy+attorney%2C+bankruptcy+lawyer&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=us&#038;geor=all&#038;date=all&#038;sort=0</a></p>
<p>Partially this has to do with the difference between the two. There is a subtle one (note, I was testing only US trends). Typically an Attorney is somebody legally empowered to represent another person, or act on their behalf in court. A Lawyer is somebody who can give legal advice and has been trained in the law. In the US the terms are generally synonomyous, however, our test shows maybe they aren&#8217;t since one trends far higher (and searches for attorney are more as well). </p>
<p>In Canada, the titles do have a bit more nuance. You typically don&#8217;t hear about attorneys unless you&#8217;re giving the &#8216;power of attorney&#8217;. Lawyers are referred to anybody who has only refers to individuals who have been called to the bar. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/08/bankruptcy-attorney-or-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Just About Mary J?</title>
		<link>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/08/why-just-about-mary-j/</link>
		<comments>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/08/why-just-about-mary-j/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anonymouslawstudent.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I&#8217;m browsing through the blog land, or some Q&#038;A forums online, why are 50% of the questions about legalizing marijuana? First off, how can a stoner coherently figure out how to post on an online forum? Secondly, what&#8217;s with the volume? Have I missed the marijuana boat? And since when has this become one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#8217;m browsing through the blog land, or some Q&#038;A forums online, why are 50% of the questions about legalizing marijuana? First off, how can a stoner coherently figure out how to post on an online forum? Secondly, what&#8217;s with the volume? Have I missed the marijuana boat? And since when has this become one of the top legal issues to trend on the web? </p>
<p>I looked a bit closer into the phenomenon and noted some trends, take what you wish from the data.  <span id="more-43"></span></p>
<p>When I search the trends of &#8216;law school&#8217; vs. &#8216;marijuana&#8217; law school actually wins in terms of mention frequency. Surprising since only a handful attempt to get into law school whereas I would surmise more than a handful smoke pot. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the trend for most of the USA, however, cities like Sacramento either need more lawyers, or have too many stoners because they have greater frequency for &#8216;marijuana&#8217; than &#8216;law school&#8217;. </p>
<p>Now make a note, this is frequency trend, meaning any mention of &#8216;law school&#8217; from law schools to search for schools outweighs the same mentions in Google for &#8216;marijuana&#8217;. Still, a bit surprising to say the least, unless Google is somehow filtering results. </p>
<p>So maybe it&#8217;s more popular to go to law school than smoke pot&#8230;.. or some other zany association I haven&#8217;t thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/08/why-just-about-mary-j/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP Lawyers Licking Chops</title>
		<link>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/06/bp-lawyers-licking-chops/</link>
		<comments>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/06/bp-lawyers-licking-chops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anonymouslawstudent.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh what I wouldn&#8217;t do to be a BP lawyer right now. Conversely, what I wouldn&#8217;t do to be anybody taking them to court. If you pick any classic Oil Giant vs. Little Guy battle you&#8217;ll find a recognizable trend: these babies drag out for EVER. You can pretty much guarantee your mortgage payments for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh what I wouldn&#8217;t do to be a BP lawyer right now. Conversely, what I wouldn&#8217;t do to be anybody taking them to court. If you pick any classic Oil Giant vs. Little Guy battle you&#8217;ll find a recognizable trend: these babies drag out for EVER. You can pretty much guarantee your mortgage payments for the next 15 years, maybe even 25. The only caveat to the BP disaster is that the spill pissed off people with TV. You can rape rural Ecuador for their oil, but if you do it in the place where TV cameras roll then you&#8217;re screwed. <span id="more-32"></span></p>
<p>The difference between BP&#8217;s lastest disaster versus others is the coverage. The media circus won&#8217;t let BP escape, at least in the short term, from ponying up some cash. You can expect that with the pressure coming from all the SE states BP will be paying up a lot more and a lot sooner than the average oil disaster. </p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean there isn&#8217;t years of litigation to be had. Do you think anybody will be held accountable, criminally, for the spill? Doubt it, but some team of lawyers is having a hayday and will for decades to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/06/bp-lawyers-licking-chops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relaunch</title>
		<link>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/05/relaunch/</link>
		<comments>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/05/relaunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anonymouslawstudent.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[**Under new ownership!** Anonymous Law Student has emerged from the wreckage and we&#8217;re going to come back with new posts from law students from around the town. Stay tuned for details, and heck, if you like to blog and want an outlet then let us know you&#8217;re interested and you can write here and make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>**Under new ownership!**</p>
<p>Anonymous Law Student has emerged from the wreckage and we&#8217;re going to come back with new posts from law students from around the town. Stay tuned for details, and heck, if you like to blog and want an outlet then let us know you&#8217;re interested and you can write here and make some cash!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anonymouslawstudent.com/2010/05/relaunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
